10. a elaborated example (cont'd)
It
may be worthwhile to examine some of the intermediate results of the generation
process. To keep the protocol as
readable
as possible some of the details have been omitted. A version with less
omissions which gives more details about the
annotated
syntax graph formed by Constituent
is in the Appendix.
Step
0:
(DescribeS
I-EinführenKameratrokar :as :NP-elliptic)
Step
1:
(Sentences
(DescribeS #<P6_EINFÜHRENARBEITSTROKAR @ #x2114fcd2>
:BY t-consecutiveProcesses
:AS :NP-elliptic))
The
original ToDescribe form is replaced by the one defined by the semantic
function t-consecutiveProcesses.
Step
2:
(GOV-CONSTITUENT
(AGGREGATION COREDAGGOBJ
(DESCRIBES #<SUREGENACTIONONOBJECT @ #x2115863a>
:BY T-HANDLING :AS :NP)))
(DESCRIBES #<SUREGENACTIONONOBJECT @ #x2115864a>
:BY T-HANDLING :AS :NP)))
(DESCRIBES #<SUREGENACTIONONOBJECT @ #x2115865a>
:BY T-HANDLING :AS :NP))))
:ELLIPSIS-NP T))
Now
this definition is expanded. In order to describe a process as :NP-elliptic
all descriptions of the subprocesses are generated as :NP’s
and these
descriptions
are then aggregated by conjunction reduction (if applicable).
Step
3:
(GOV-CONSTITUENT
(AGGREGATION COREDAGGOBJ
(NOUN-PHRASE :NOUN (MAKENOUN "anheben")
:ATTRIBUTE (NOUN-PHRASE :NOUN "Bauchdecke"
:PRONOUN:DEFINITE :CASE 2)
:SUPPLEMENT (NOUN-PHRASE
:NOUN (NOUN-PHRASE :NOUN "Backhausklemme"
:NUMERAL "zwei")
:PREPOSITION "mit"))))
(NOUN-PHRASE :NOUN (MAKENOUN "einführen")
:ATTRIBUTE (NOUN-PHRASE :NOUN "Kameratrokar"
:PRONOUN :DEFINITE :CASE 2))))
(NOUN-PHRASE :NOUN (MAKENOUN "einbringen")
:ATTRIBUTE (NOUN-PHRASE :NOUN "Optik"
:PRONOUN :DEFINITE :CASE 2)))))
:ELLIPSIS-NP T))
The
respective definitions for the subprocesses are now expanded, basically
giving noun phrase expressions.
-
previous: example
up (home) next: example
(cont'd)
-